WARNING ! This site contains Scriptural Truths
Noah was the tenth generation (father-to-son), and the first father to have NO daughters! Instead, we are presented with the quest of learning which of his three sons will lead on to Abraham, to David, and to Jesus.
How many generations from Adam to Jesus? The answer begins in Genesis chapter five where the first ten generations are found, ending with Noah#10 who was "perfect in his generations", Gen6:9.
The next ten generation list is found in 1Chr1:24, beginning with son Shem and ending with Abram#20. The 3rd list of ten generations is at the conclusion of the Book of Ruth, where we find that three generations have been 'skipped' (Isaac, Jacob, Judah), meaning Boaz was generation #30 and David was #33. This "precept" from the O.T. leads on to a conclusion of Jesus being generation #66.
Yes, just like the Books in the Bible, because Jesus really is the Word, the Son, the Seed, etc.
Of Noah's 3 sons, it's Shem who leads the way to Abraham, and of Judah's 5 sons, it's Pharez who leads the way to David. From David's 20 sons we must learn which one leads to Jesus.
Whenever a father has more than one son, it may take some searching to discover which one leads to Jesus; and in modern times it's the son who carries on the family name, but daughters may choose to exchange their family name for the New Name of their husband.
When the five 'skipped' generations are added to the middle column of fourteen in Matthew chapter one it balances the 19 names prior to Abraham. "One generation passeth away, and another generation cometh: but the earth abideth for ever". Ecc1:4
The first question people usually ask: "How long is a generation?" They're looking for a specific number, but there is no specific number; it's no different from the 4-generation pic of our own families, where a specific 'age' is not a factor. Some think a generation was forty years because of how the Israeli generation wandered in the wilderness for that period, Numb14:33, and some point to how the Israeli's were to spend four hundred years in Egypt before exiting in the fourth generation, Gen15:16. However, from Grandpa or Grandma to Grandson or Granddaughter
is still four generations--it isn't age nor gender conditional.
Granddad / Dad / Daughter / Grandson - cp to: Jacob/Joseph/Mary/Jesus.
"But when the fulness of the time was come,
God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the
law.." Gal 4:4.
Finally! It was father-to-son from generation
to generation, until finally it was father-to-daughter! Matthew's
gospel finally completes the red thread of generations that
connects Adam to Jesus! It only took about four thousand
years--four millenniums which is forty centuries..
The Family of Adam & Eve - Generation #1
||Other sons, daughters
Adam - Seth - Enos - Cainan - Mahalaleel - Jared - Enoch
- Methuselah - Lamech - Noah. "Noah was a just man and PERFECT(?) in his generations..." Gen6:9. - His was the tenth, so this a clue to the three groups of ten generations leading to David, as well as a precept for the three columns of fourteen in Matthew 1.
We know we're counting these first ten generations correctly
because it agrees with verse 14 of Jude (calling Enoch the 7th
from Adam), as well as Genesis 5 and 1Chronicles.
Observe that when 'a thousand years are as one day', Adam dies on 'Day One' -- 70 years short of making it to the second millennium.
Before Enoch was "taken", the first nine of those patriarchs could have set down for lunch together, or a 9gen photo op. Lamech died 5 years before
the Flood, and Methuselah died the very year of the flood, whether by drowning or natural causes; we aren't told. It's interesting to note how the USA has gone from horse and buggy
to space travel in just 400 years, and these first ten named generations had over a thousand years, and possibly more intelligence than we have now in these 'latter days'. You think?
The next ten generations, Shem #11, to Abraham #20, are itemized in Gen11:10-26 and in 1Chr1:24-27.
A third grouping of ten generations is found in Ruth chapt. four, which takes us from Pharez #24 to David #33.
David is #33, and "he
reigned in Jerusalem thirty and three years."
2Sam5:5, 1K2:11, 1Chr29:27. Scripture emphasizes this by repeating
it in those three books.
Solomon #34, Hezekiah #46, Assir #52, Zorobabel #54. These
later generations are not without some stumbling blocks, as
though the Great Author didn't want us to discover it in earlier
times. Matthew 1:15,16 takes us from Jacob #63 to Joseph to Mary
to Jesus #66. Wow!!
The GENERATIONS (Hebrew: toledoth) of Heaven & Earth, of Adam, of Noah, of Shem, of Terah, of Ishmael, of Isaac, of Esau, and of
Jacob are all recorded in the Book of Genesis. The Book of Matthew introduces itself as "The Book of the Generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham."
The principle of 'passing down the seed' is found in Exodus 1:5 -- "And all the souls that came out of the loins of Jacob were seventy souls: for Joseph was in Egypt already".
Sixty-six generations from Adam to Jesus,
and sixty-six books in the Bible, because Jesus really is the
Word of God who came in the flesh. Is that like finding hidden gold?
The 3 periods of 14 generations, Matthew 1:17, inspire some to a partial arithmetic solution of forty-two (42) generations,
but fails to consider the skipped names in Solomon's column or the nineteen names leading to Abraham. It is this reckoning which leads
to a new, more significant, solution of 2 periods of 33 names instead of the 3 periods of 14.
One of the stumbling blocks is that the Joseph in Matthew 1:16
cannot be Mary's husband (or they'd be in the same generation) --
that Joseph must be her father instead. Besides, having her
husband in the genealogy of Jesus would seem to belie Jesus' true
father. The Aramaic text uses the word "gavra" (mighty
man: not necessarily a husband)) for the "husband" of
The father of Mary's husband was Heli (Luke3:23), but the Joseph#64
in Matthew 1:16 had a father named Jacob. Mystery solved, because these two Joseph's cannot be the same!
There's more! The Joseph in Egypt was not
in the pedigree of Christ, and neither is the Joseph husband of
Mary, because Jesus really is the Son of God!
Like a Thoroughbred Race Horse, the genealogy of Jesus has been engineered all the way from Genesis to Matthew, with only a single reference to 'pedigrees', in Num1:18. Because you may not
have heard this before, it may be difficult to digest.(A truth hard to swallow). I've found
it helpful to realize that the Blessed Virgin had a husband and a
father with the same name. Just as we do! You don't often (ever?)
hear about it, but Isaiah 54:5 confirms that our Heavenly Father
is also a heavenly husband! (Compare to 2Cor11:2 --in the New
Covenant he's a bridegroom!).
The Apostle Paul prayed that he might make known the mystery
of the gospel, Eph6:19, so it shouldn't come as a surprise when
we find things hidden in the Word. We've been created in His image, and I'm sure
that includes Agatha Christie as well as Ellery Queen and Sherlock Holmes. Elementary?
The Generation Chart
All the generations from Adam to David are thirty-three (33),
and all the generations from Solomon to Jesus are 33. [Compare the symmetry
logic with Matthew 1:17].
Genesis 5 and 11, 1Chr1-3:17 .................> Three
Periods of 14 Generations
||34. K. Solomon
||35. K. Rehoboam
||54. Zerubbabel Ezra3:2
||22. Jacob I
||36. K. Abijam
||37. K. Asa
||38. K. Jehoshaphat
||39. K. Jehoram
|7. Enoch II
||40. * K. Ahaziah
||41. *K. Joash
|9. Lamech II
||42. * K. Amaziah
||43. K. Uzziah / Azariah
||30. Boaz (Ruth)
||44. K. Jotham
||63. Jacob II
||45. K. Ahaz
||46. K. Hezekiah
||33. King DAVID
||47. K. Manasseh
||48. K. Amon
||49. K. Josiah
||50. * K. Jehoiakim
||51. K. Jechonias / Coniah
||52. * Assir - (NIV omits)
The Zerubbabel of 1Chr3:19 is the wrong one. The Jerusalem phase finishes with Jeconiah/Assir/Salathiel in 1Chr3:17, and then we pick up the correct Zerubbabel in Ezra3:2, where the 70 yrs of Babylon begin.
1Chronicles, chapt. 3 - KJV
1Chr3:9 These were all the sons of David, beside the sons of the concubines, and Tamar their sister. |
3:10: And Solomon's son was Rehoboam, Abia his son, Asa his son, Jehoshaphat his son,
11: Joram his son, Ahaziah his son, Joash his son,
12: Amaziah his son, Azariah(Uzziah) his son, Jotham his son,
13: Ahaz his son, Hezekiah his son, Manasseh his son,
14: Amon his son, Josiah his son.
15: And the sons of Josiah were, the firstborn Johanan, the second Jehoiakim, the third Zedekiah, the fourth Shallum.
16: And the sons of Jehoiakim: Jeconiah his son, Zedekiah his son.
1Ch:3:17: And the sons of Jeconiah; Assir, Salathiel(Shealtiel) his son(*Don't follow Pedaiah of 3:19)Now we've gone to Babylon, and
the next name, Zerubbabel, is over at Ezra3:2,
5:2, and Haggai.
Instead of 3 groups of 14 generations, we have 4 groups (19+14: twice), after the five missing
names are included in the Solomon column. Notice that there are thirty-three (33) generations
leading to David, and then thirty-three (33) leading to Jesus.
Then note that all of the sixty-six names (except for Jacob) are
unique and different. The generations marked with (*) are
recorded in the Old Testament, but aren't found in Matthew: a
fact which to this very day continues to baffle many scholars.
Don't get side-tracked from the father-to-son line over to the progression
of the throne (king line), and don't get mislead because of the two father/son named Salathiel(Shealtiel, Ezra3:2) and Zorubbable. Matt 1:12 and Lk3:27 refer. Zedekiah was the final king of Judah, and a family member, but he wasn't in the line of Christ.
* When the five 'missing' names are added to Solomon's column,
it balances the column under Adam with 19 names. Why did the
Author leave out the 3 names beginning with Ahaziah? It marks the
ratio of 39/27, the books of the Old and New Testaments.
COUNT 'EM: There are exactly forty (40) names between the two Jacobs!
The last name in Solomon's column, "Assir" (means
captive or prisoner) isn't found in the NIV, having been
translated and applied to Jeconiah. It's a legitimate name
according to Ex6:24.
Confusing names? Jeconiah is another name for Jehoiachin, son of Jehoiakim (also known as Eliakim, 2K23:30), and is the same "Coniah" boy-king who received the 'childless' curse of Jer22:30 and has caused many to believe the line of Christ came through Nathan. Coniah's son Assir was born in Babylon and never gained the throne. The final king, Zedekiah, was NOT in the pedigree of Jesus, nor was Jehoahaz.
The genealogy in Luke 3 shows the PRIEST LINE pedigree of
Mary's husband ("supposed" father of Jesus) and is NOT part of Jesus' pedigree. They were both from the Tribe of Judah (House of
David) as required lawfully by Numb 36:6: Mary from David's son Solomon, and her husband from David's son Nathan. The Cainan of Lk3:36 must be a
copyist error from 3:37 unless both the Genesis and 1Chr accounts have errors
of omission. If there were indeed two (2) Cainan's, it would upset not only the sixty-six count, and the three "ten generation" count, but
also the significance of the unique names in the pedigrees of David and Christ. The "two" Cainan's would be an anomaly! A red-herring for us to uncover, maybe?
So why would anyone want to deny the sixty-six (66) count? However, for
further study, click here to check out the parallel generations of Nathan and Solomon.
Are you sitting down?
ONLY TWO JACOBS IN THE BIBLE!! There comes a time when you come across too
many coincidences for it to be coincidence, and the record of the
two Enoch's, two Lamech's, and two Jacob's fit that category. When you note that both Jacob's have a son named Joseph, it gets even more intriguing..
The first Enoch was the son of Cain (3rd gen.) and
the first Lamech was also in the line of Cain (7th gen.), counting from Adam.
Adam to Cain to Enoch to Irad to Mehujael to Methusael to Lamech. This Lamech#1 is a self
confessed murderer and the first person in scripture to have two
wives, but the genealogy abruptly ceases at this point.
"The foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men". 1Cor1:25
Hidden truth!! When the
Book of Jude, verse 14, refers to Enoch the 7th from
Adam, it doesn't identify him as Enoch#2, but that has to be the
case and he has to have descended from Adam's third son, Seth. We
note that several names are similar, but only Enoch and
Lamech are identical to the names in Cain's line. Enoch#2 is in the 7th
generation and Lamech#2 is in the 9th generation. I
believe God knows that 7 x 9 = 63, don't you?.
Weren't there enough names to go around?
Why in the world would you want to copy someone else's name, and
especially when those persons were a murderer and the son of a
murderer? (See the poem "City of Enoch"). The subject
is especially interesting after you've read in Philippians
concerning the name above every name, and in Psalms where God
named all the stars....any two of them alike?.
A CRYPTOGRAM! Some call it revelation and some call it
illumination. Whatever -- at least two thrilling points come from
this study. First, every name from Adam to Jesus is different and
unique except for the name "Jacob"
(means supplanter: to take the place of). The first Jacob
followed Abraham and Isaac, and the second Jacob came just before
Joseph, Mary, and Jesus. Jacob#2 is the 63rd
generation from Adam! So the 7th
name, times the 9th
name, equals the 63rd
name, and these three (and no others) are suffixed with
Roman numeral II. Could this cryptogram really be coincidental?
The name 'Jacob' means supplanter (not deceiver as some teach) Gen27:36 affirms |
I don't think so--it seems to me the Author
is emphasizing the multiple two's in scripture, and giving
confirmation of the sixty-six books and supporting the meaning of
supplanter. The first Enoch and first Lamech were in the line of Cain,
so they don't figure in Jesus' pedigree.
Enoch#2 was a preacher and prophet who
foretold that the Lord would be coming with ten thousands of His
saints, Jude 14. Already, in only seven generations, mankind was
being told about Judgment. Lamech#1 was in that same generation
-- he confessed to his two wives that he'd killed a young man.
Comparing himself to Cain who killed Abel, he declared in so many
words that his crime was greater, and it seems to me that he was
the one who shortened the life of Preacher Enoch who died at
"only" 365 years. (Others of that era lived to be eight
or nine hundred). Maybe the preacher told Lamech that having two
wives wasn't right with God? Because Cain had killed
"righteous Abel", Mt23:35, what could be a greater
crime than to attack God's man of that day?
Because Jesus is "the same
yesterday, today, and forever", Heb13:8, and because
Paul wrote about being "absent from the body, and
present with the Lord", 2Cor5:8, it's my personal
opinion that Enoch#2 was the victim of Lamech#1. Bad things do
happen to good people, but when they leave their body, God takes
them! The Author is introducing that concept in Genesis, and
giving us lots of time to think about it, before Paul says it
Establishing the Pedigree. Don't take
offence at the word "pedigree" -- it's used in Numbers
1:18(with an 's'). As long as a father has only one son it's easy to trace the
pedigree, but Noah had three sons (Shem, Ham, and Japheth) and
initially it was difficult to see which line would prevail.
Eventually though, as we continued reading, it was the son Shem
which led the way to Abraham. Shem#11, Arphaxad, Salah,
Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abraham#20.
Matthews Gospel begins with Abraham, so we need to remember the
nineteen generations which preceded him.
We're tracing the generations (a red thread
in the document, or you could think of it as a kind of watermark)
and from Abraham to Isaac to Jacob should be a given (unless
you're an Arab), because Jesus himself authenticated those three
patriarchs. If the only book you ever read is Genesis, then
Joseph would likely be counted as the fourth generation, but when you
continue, you learn that Jesus descended from Judah, and suddenly
you're considering the matter from an entirely different
perspective.. "Moreover he refused the tabernacle of
Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim: but chose
the tribe of Judah, the Mount Zion which he
Hezekiah was King of Judah when the Northern Kingdom of Israel was vanquished by the Assyrians, 2Kings18:9, but Hezekiah's throne was succeeded by Manasseh, and Amon, and Josiah, so it isn't clear why Isaiah 1:1 and Hosea 1:1 both concluded their 4-generation intro with Hezekiah.
From Great-grandpa, to Grandpa, to Father, to Son -- Isaiah 1:1 and Hosea 1:1 both read from:
Uzziah to Jotham to Ahaz to Hezekiah -- 4 generations of father to son!
Generation. It's intriguing to say the least. It was the
2nd son of Abraham (not Ishmael), and the 2nd
son of Isaac (not Esau), and the 4th son of Jacob,
which eventually led to Jesus. Jacob's firstborn had defiled his
father's bed (so Joseph got the double-portion), and Simeon and
Levi had avenged the rape of their sister, so it was Judah who continued the
line of Christ.
There's an interesting pattern of four
generations that probably isn't accidental. Remember the Joseph here
is reckoned as Mary's father instead of her husband (she's an "example" of a wise virgin,
and so she had a husband and father with the same name!).
||#7 Enoch II
||#63 Jacob II
||#9 Lamech II
|| ? Joseph/Judah ?
God had told Abraham that his seed would sojourn in Egypt for 400 years, and
would be there until the FOURTH generation. Gen15:16. WHY THE DELAY?, I wondered. Because "the
iniquity of the Amorites was not yet full". Same kind of thing as happened to Sodom and Gomorrah, and
now it seems that America has a land full of Amorites as well...
Hindsight! Students will ask "What about the Abraham Covenant?", which they believe
began in the Genesis Period, but that was only "by Promise" and eventually initiated by Moses in Exodus 19 and taught by Paul in Hebrews 9:19. The first use of the word "promise"
occurs in Numbers 14:34, speaking of a "breach of promise" (a breach meaning 'altering of purpose' is the meaning of the name of Pharez: the
son of Judah through whom the line of Christ proceeded).|
...Most of us are aware that the Bible
wasn't written in chapter and verse -- that these were added
later. None of the original documents have survived, and the
oldest copies lack even basic punctuation. Some were all in small
letters (cursive) and some in all capitals (uncils). Seems to me
it's some kind of a miracle that it has evolved to what
we have today. He watches over his Word to perform it... Jer1:12.
Sixty-six books in the Bible (no more, no less) and sixty-six generations from Adam to Jesus
a. 66 chapters to Isaiah. c. Acrostics of Lamentations.
b. 39/27 of Hezekiah/Josiah. d. Gen46 & Lev12.
e. Bible Center.
ISAIAH - No nonsense "scholars" tells us this book was written by two authors; that the first writer left off with chapter 39 and the second author concluded the final 27 chapters. Maybe they were just oblivious to this 'numbered' arrangement of the Old to the New testaments?? And, since chapters 36, 37, 38, and 39 all had to do with Hezekiah, maybe they weren't looking for a pattern-of-four (tetrad) as a kind of alerting signal?
LAMENTATIONS - Some say this book was originally part of JEREMIAH, and
if that were so then we wouldn't have sixty-six books: we'd have
sixty-five. The number of Books of Kings may also have changed,
and the New Testament books such as 2Peter and Jude were very
nearly excluded, we're told. So what if the number were different
in other times? My position is that God could have arranged it
"for such a time as this". We're in the 4th
quarter of this great game, and the 2-minute warning has already
Lamentation has five chapters, and it's all in acrostic form. That is, the first verse of each chapter begins
with the letter "A" (Hebrew aleph), the second verse
with "B" (beth), and so forth. Since the Hebrew
alphabet has 22 letters, it isn't surprising that chapters 1, 2,
4, and 5 each have 22 verses. (Chapter five is different--the 22
verses aren't in acrostic form.)
22 - 22 - 66 - 22 - 22
The human hand illustrates, with the thumb as chapter five.
Chapter three, however, has sixty-six
verses: it's a TRIPLE acrostic. (Compare to the "8" of Psalm 119). Three verses beginning with
"a", then three verses beginning with "b",
etc. It's axiomatic then, that the verses in chapters 1,2, and 4
also add up to sixty-six. A dictionary will describe an acrostic as a puzzle or poem where succeeding letters of the alphabet are used..
When you know that David was #33 in the generations, and
Jesus is #66; it's just natural to have a certain respect for
these numbers, and the only times they appear together in
scripture is in Genesis 46 and Leviticus 12.
The subject in Leviticus is the time
required for the purification of a woman who has given birth, so
that she can come into the sanctuary. If she had a son, she must
wait thirty-three days following his
circumcision, and if she had a daughter the time was sixty-six
days following a two week separation. Once we're aware of
patterns, it's the heavenly sanctuary the children of God are
looking to, and praying they are worthy to escape the terrible
things coming to pass. Lk21:36. "For we know that the
whole creation groans and travails in pain together until
The Old Covenant brought forth the Son, and the New
Covenant is to bring forth wise and fruitful virgins. First
the male, then the female. Just as Adam and Eve
illustrated. Not silly women or foolish fellows, but there is "neither
Jew nor Greek, neither bond nor free, there is neither
male nor female; for ye are all one in Christ
Jesus". Gal 3:28.
I'll be surprised if the 33 or 66
correlates to specific units of time (maybe two millennium?), but
it does seem to endorse equal time periods for the Two Covenants. Time, and half-a-time, maybe.
They certainly support the thesis that the Old Covenant (for the
Jew, under the Law) represents the male, and the New Covenant
(for Gentiles, by faith) the female.
We're dealing here with how many of Jacob's household are going
down to Egypt. Remember, Jacob "knew" four women: two
wives and two concubines. Leah was the fruitful wife who gave him
six sons and a daughter -- it was her side of the family who sent
thirty-three souls down into Egypt, v15. The
other wife, Rachel, had two sons, as did each of the two
concubines, and altogether "All the souls that
came with Jacob into Egypt, which came out of his loins, besides
Jacob's sons wives, all the souls were threescore
and six." Gen46:26. Joseph was
already down there, and his Egyptian wife had borne him two sons;
Manasseh and Ephraim, who were ostensibly adopted into the twelve
original tribes. (Manasseh represents the Jews, and Ephraim the
Gentiles--but that's another story).
Scripture puts a curious emphasis on these
numbers: 33 & 66, and it may only be for the
purpose of a later association with David and Jesus, or possibly
for our understanding about doubling.
Hezekiah & Josiah.
Why these two, especially? Mainly because they're special in
several ways. A study in both comparison and contrast, if you
will. (Who called for the taxi? You looked like you were getting
drowsy, and I wanted to get your attention.)
Scholars maintain the Book of Isaiah had
two authors, and that the second author took over in chapter 40.
Since Isaiah contains a total of 66 chapters, it
seems they want to divide it into the first 39, and the last 27.
Isn't that great! Just like the Bible itself.
For the complete story of Hezekiah, you
have to read 2Kings, 2Chronicles, and chapters 36, 37, 38, &
39 of Isaiah. These four chapters are all about Hezekiah, and
then in chapter 40 the subject abruptly switches to John the
Baptist. See Luke 3:4. I understand why the scholars say what
they say, but instead of about 40 authors, I'm convinced of one
Scripture says about Hezekiah: "He
trusted in the LORD God of Israel; so that after him was none
like him among all the kings of Judah, nor any that were before
him." 2K18:5. It says about Josiah: "And like
unto him was there no king before him, that turned to
the LORD with all his soul, and with all his might, according to
all the law of Moses; neither after him arose there any like him.
You might think it said these things about
many kings, but not so -- just these two. Other good kings get
praise, but this "before & after" phrase is special
Hezekiah is probably best known for his
receiving an additional fifteen years of life; confirmed by
seeing the sun dial return ten degrees. I say he saw the shadow
of the changing time, a parallel to seeing the leaves come on the
trees and knowing summer is nigh, and to the present day scenario
(perilous times, 2Tim3:1) when everything that's Holy gets
ridiculed and scorned.
Sure, it was a miracle. If he hadn't gotten
the 15 yrs., it would have interrupted the generations to Christ,
because his son Manasseh was only 12 yrs. old when he succeeded
his father on the throne. You might think of it as a miracle
birth for Manasseh. And isn't a miraculous birth (of
Jesus and of You and I) what the scripture is all about?
Both Hezekia and Josiah celebrated notable
Passover Feasts. The amended Passover by Hezekiah was compared to
that of Solomon's, 2Chr30:26, and the regular Passover by Josiah
was compared to that of Samuel, 2Chr35:18. If this is an allegory
(I could be wrong), it may be talking about "the first shall
be last, and the last first". Josiah is perhaps best known
for being prophesied by name decades earlier, in
1K13:2. Yet he didn't seem to be aware of it until they'd found
the lost book, 2Chr34:14, and then he suddenly realized he'd been
doing something wrong! Even though he'd been "good" and
"loyal", the Lost Book opened his eyes. Could this be
implying that the Jews will finally be reading the New
Testament--will they see themselves in Revelation 7? Or will they
see the Church rise to be with the Lord?
Hezekiah made a remarkable statement: "..the
children are come to the
birth, and there is not strength to bring forth."
Isa37:3. The new birth wasn't awarded to the Old Covenant
"Children of Israel", but rather has come in through
the New Covenant and the arrival of the Holy Spirit. This
statement of Hezekia must be remembered in connection with the
way Jesus chided Nicodemus for not knowing about the new birth.
Also, it adds to the evidence that the Old Testament (or
Covenant) was for the Jews (the children), and the New Testament
is for the adults who are able to be reasoned with. I'm opposed to
the teaching that your mind and intellect must be side-lined or
put out to pasture when you get saved.
Are you ready for this? It's the 39/27
ratio. It's coincidence upon coincidence unless the Author has done this on purpose. Despite
being so great and following after the Lord, Josiah died at the
tender age of 39 in a presumptive battle against the King of
Egypt. 2K22:1. King Necho had said God was with him, and for
Josiah not to interfere, but Josiah wouldn't listen. So he died
aged 39 -- the number of books of the Old Testament. This is why
I think Josiah represents the Children, or the Old Covenant.
Hezekiah was the one man in the Bible who
knew the year of his death. He was 39 at the time the Lord
granted him another fifteen years, and 54 when he died. Twice the
number of the books of the New Testament. The prophet Isaiah had
also told Hezekiah: "..On the third day thou shalt go up
unto the house of the LORD." 2K20:5. Because the THIRD
DAY is such a significant part of scripture (See SIXDAYS), I've
assigned Hezekiah, in my mind, as representing the New Covenant.
The first shall be last, and the last, first. Amen and amen.
Luke3 Genealogy – 74 names when the Cainan of Arphaxad omitted
Adam, Seth, Enos, Cainan, Maleleel, Jared, Enoch, Mathusala, Lamech, Noe   (1st ten)
Shem, Arphaxad, Cainan, Sala, Heber, Phalec, Ragau, Saruch, Nachor, Thara, Abraham, (eleven)
Isaac, Jacob, Juda, Phares, Esrom, Aram, Aminadab, Naasson, Salmon, Booz (3rd ten)
Obed, Jesse, David, Nathan, Mattatha, Menan, Melea, Eliakim, Jonan, Joseph (4th ten)
Judah, Simeon, Levi, Matthat, Jorim, Eliezer, Jose, Er, Elmodam, Cosam (5th ten)
Addi, Melchi, Neri, Salathiel, Zorobabel, Rhesa, Joanna, Juda, Joseph, Semei, (6th ten)
Mattathias, Maath, Nagge, Esli, Naum, Amos, Mattathias, Joseph, Janus, Melchi (7th ten)
Levi, Matthat, Heli, "supposed Joseph" (Mary not included..)
* Note the four Josephs, and other repeated names.
* The Levi and the Eliezer in 5th row bear witness to this Priestly Line.
* The father-son of Salathiel/Zorobabel are different from the pair in Matthew.
Got good (20/20) eyesight?
Using Bishop Ussher figure of 4004 for the time of Adam, and assuming Moses born 2200 AA (After Adam), and near the acrostic number, the Flood began in 1656 AA (After Adam) or 2348 B.C., and Moses born 2200 AA, or 4004-2200=1804 BC.
It doesn't take a math major to check this out...
To Table of
"So run, that ye may obtain.."
Bob is duxrowQ@Qyahoo.com(omit the Q's)
Use 'website' in subject..
My way of trying to thwart the web crawlers who harvest addresses for the spammers..
This page established Oct. 2, 2000 by Bob Smith.
Copyright © 2000 Prince of Peace Ministries,
Inc. Permission is granted to freely copy these unmodified Bible
teachings in electronic form or in print. Freely I am giving, so freely pass it on!